Skip to content
21 januari 2012 / Peroni

Demokrater i pyjamas

Var ju ganska självklart.
Håkan säger ”Hej då”.

Skönt tycker jag.
För Håkans skull.

Ingen man, av kvinna född,
kan uthärda den konstanta anspänning
han tvingats utstå efter det att han snurrat
bort sig själv (och därmed partiet) i Libyenfrågan.

I går mötte Jämtin pressuppbådet.
VU (S), hade då tillbringat två hela dagar
med att dryfta, eh,…  …framtidsfrågor.

Det hela måste ha gått mycket fortare än
man tänkt sig. Tji nattmangling.

Varför skulle annars en partisekreterare
möta ”Drevet” iklädd …   …Pyjamas?

Annonser

8 kommentarer

  1. M. Flessas / Jan 21 2012 9:29 e m

    And you, Peroni, what about you? A coward with a blog that will not allow the comment I made after your last comment in your previous post because it had the names of your pals who’ll be leaving Katrineholm government life in 2014?

  2. Peroni / Jan 21 2012 11:34 e m

    Ledsen. Ser inte att du postat nå´n
    kommentar i dag som inte publicerats.

    Skriv igen så lägger jag ut den.

    Och du: Lägg ner det där ”Coward” – tjafset!
    Du kan bättre än så.

  3. M. Flessas / Jan 22 2012 1:08 f m

    The comments are simply not published when you fear being shown up. Furthermore, to quote my own words back to me here about doing better is not applicable. Post what I commented upon which mentioned Mattias Jansson and Fredrik Olovsson (S).

    Peroni, you are a coward. It’s not up to me to change my comment about your cowardice when it’s absolutely true and applicable to you as it is also applicable to some of the Socialdemokraterna politicians and their sycophants and two Moderaterna politicians in Katrineholm. Don’t play lie-and-deny with me.

    Now, come forward and identify yourself…coward.

  4. Peroni / Jan 22 2012 11:11 f m

    Nej. Som du förstår kan jag
    inte publicera en kommentar jag inte
    har mottagit.

    I övrigt ser jag blott förvirring i det du
    skriver. Samt möjligen det självklara:

    Att du fortfarande inte lyckats beskriva
    var kritiken mot Wistbacka skulle vara
    nedtecknad. Vilket i sin tur tyder på att
    du är uppenbart förrvirrad också i detta..

    Puss!

  5. M. Flessas / Jan 22 2012 1:48 e m

    I’ve described one aspect of the criticism as it applies to Christians in one of your related posts. So far as Wistbacka is concerned, one would think that you would not taunt him as you did. Just go read what you wrote; it’s self-evident to anyone who is willing to think. Wistbacka’s an old fellow now. Have you seen him recently? He says he’s feeling better but age is wearing on him. It’s obvious. But since you’ve seemed to have learned to argue from listening to Fredrik Olovsson (S) and other disingenuous interlocutors like him in Katrineholm (Thomas Selig, Mattias Jansson, and, recently, Elisabet Bäck at K-Kuriren come to mind), there’s not much one can do to convince you otherwise.

    This reminds me of a story. I might not have the story precisely right because he’s no longer alive to ask about the story and I can’t recall if he wrote it or merely said it but I recall that philosopher Robert Nozick (author of ”Anarchy, State and Utopia” among other books) said something along the lines of this: When one has argued and still one’s interlocutor refuses to admit the correct form and conclusion of the argument, lighting should strike them. At least, that’s what many might wish for an stubbornly errant interlocutor. While I don’t wish such an end to you, Peroni, you might consider wearing rubber shoes and avoid high places when it rains and thunders.

    Have a pleasant day. Try to stay out of trouble.

    :::: :::: :::: :::: :::: :::: :::: ::::

    So You´re arguing that I´ve ”taunted” him, beacause you claim
    I´ve ”taunted” him. When, in fact I didn´t?

    Sorry, Brother.
    Your logic sucks.
    In this case.

    Now, pretty please, with sugar on top:
    Go bark up another (wrong) tree.

    Subito!

  6. M. Flessas / Jan 22 2012 4:31 e m

    No, Peroni, you don’t get it, I’m not ”begging the question” (that’s the phrase for which you might have been searching). I am mocking you. Besides, I’ve explained that your picking on Wistbacka is self-evident because I want you to go back and think about what you wrote. That’s not begging the question. That’s getting you to examine what you wrote carefully. I did not claim you insulted Wistbacka and thus you insulted Wistbacka. That would make no sense and I don’t make those kind of begging the question mistakes. Furthermore, if you read the sentence you wrote in English in the original post, you’ll find the insult: ”The immaculate conception of a bearded bloggvalp?” You called an old man a ”bloggvalp”-one should not mock an old man who no longer carries weight as he once did in Katrineholm, i.e., his political and economic power is diminished greatly (Aside: Just as Mr. Dahlström’s (S) power will be in a few short years whether by retirement or by removal in 2014.) It’s one thing to mock a politician who mocks the political process by their actions, it’s another thing to mock a sick, rindeed, ”fangless” old man. Go easy on Wistbacka. Have pity on him as you’ll probably want people to pity you one day in your dotage.

    Do you remember the genesis of ”bloggvalp” as it came about in Katrineholm? Jog your visual memory. Tell me if you recall. Meanwhile, try to be a nicer Peroni. I am trying to be a nicer Flessas. Really, I’m making an effort because local Socialdemokraterna-including Elisabet Bäck?-want to ”play nice” or, at least, appear to ”play nice” when it comes to the general discourse in Katrineholm. Are you going to ”play nice”, Peroni?

    ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: :::: ::: ::: :::

    Det som roar mig mest, Flessas, är att
    ju längre dina texter är, ju mer intetsägande
    ter de sig. Du får nog acceptera att du faktiskt,
    åtminstone i detta fallet, har fel.

    I brist på bättre kan du väl ägna dig
    en stund åt något annat än att diskutera
    absurditeter med mig.

    Törs man rekommendera det Indiska Reptricket?

  7. M. Flessas / Jan 22 2012 7:32 e m

    ”Du får nog acceptera att du faktiskt, åtminstone i detta fallet, har fel.” – Peroni

    Oh, because you say so? LOL! Peroni, you are too dumb and too intellectually dishonest to deal with. Adios, coward.

  8. Krister Wistbacka / Feb 21 2012 11:41 e m

    Borde kanske, trots allt, säga något om denna besynnerliga dialog, besynnerlig därför att det jag föreställer mig att den handlar om inte ägt rum, Såvitt jag vet har Peroni inte i något sammanhang yttrat något som förödmjukat mig och han har av allt att döma inte heller avsett att göra det, Jag för min del anser fortfarande <peroni vara en av de intressantaste och stilfullaste av alla bloggare med anknytning till Katrineholm.

    Flessas, innerst är du en snäll man, tror jag. Men vad vill du med detta?

Kommentarer inaktiverade.